Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Christoicism - The Philosophy of The Count of Monte Christo

Well, we tried this once already and found that the first idea didn't work.

But let's summarize a few things: With all that is going wrong in the world, why are you fucking around with Philosophy?  And my answer is, exactly.

[Confused Pikachu Face]

(I mean, if there's a shocked Pikachu face, there is a meme out there with confused Pikachu right?)

A Philosphy is: "the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic discipline.

a particular system of philosophical thought.

plural noun: philosophies"

Or in plain english, its the Operating system for your brain.  The 20th century was largely a contest of ideologies: Communism, Capitalism, Fascism and Democracy.  Capitalism seemed to win until the advent of Fox News turned the 1rst Amendment and axiomatic diatribes we inherited from the 18th century and shows why fanatical devotion to the 1rst amenmend is a terrible fucking idea.

And more importantly, as I've researched WHAT to put here, I've come to realize that you can fit a work of fiction to your lens if you want, no matter what you do.  I've thought exercized Lawful Good versions of Baileyism or Chaotic Evil ones.  And you can do the same thing to the Count of Monte Cristo.   But I stand by my decision to pick this work based on the principal that its both a work that most people recognize, with a widely recongized hero, but also a very morally complicated one.  

Spoilers from the book from the one person that read this far who hasnt read the book.  Who am I kidding? Thats almost assuredly zero, but for purposes of this thought exercize, we'll proceed.

Summary randomly stolen: "A poor, good-hearted sailor named Edmond Dantès gets wrongfully imprisoned by jealous rivals, rots in a dungeon for years, escapes, finds a treasure on the Isle of Monte Cristo, reinvents himself as a fabulously rich and mysteriously powerful nobleman, and then, in a grand operatic blaze of cunning, disguise, and vengeance, utterly wrecks the lives of the bastards who ruined his—but not without learning that forgiveness might be stronger than revenge, if not quite as satisfying."

The pihlosophy I want and that I think we need is POST ism.   It has to be able to deal with complicated scenarios and agitprop and a world where AI can make us question what's the fucking POINT of even being alive?  And these are questions we've needed to ask about the increasing rot of capitalism democracy for quite some time.  Western Liberal Democracy infested with Capitalism has created prosperity but to misquote Margaret Thatcher, "It works pretty good until you run out of other people's money to pay for it."

Unlimited Freedom of Speech; or framly any variety thereof creates a rot that allows the rich and the elite to leverage democracy to their favor and a cycle of corruption that makes people more cyncical about democracy and their freedom until they are willing to do most anything to fix it including burn the world down.  The Founding Fathers learned the lessons of Athens so they made checks and balances against Tyranny, but those were thrown out the window because we had so much trouble amending the constitution when we needed it that the minority undemocratic faction stalled and stalled and stalled until tehy got their cictator psycho elected.

Edmund Dantes is not a guy who sits around and twiddles his thumbs and accepts his lot in the world.  The part about "There are things in this world that you cannot control" from Stoicism is absolutely one hundred percent on.  But the part of "Learn to accept it" is replaced in Christoicism with "Fuck That" to "I'm going to make the world a better place as best I can."

I like this work not just because of the attitude of Dantes to adversity but because he uses iterative, recursive and planned methods and means to achieve justice.  He understands that in a world where the levers of justice have been turned agaisnt you there is no justice but what you take yourself.   Christoicism is the Neutral Good philosophy of the revolutionary; there are times when you must be Chaotic Good and there are times where you must put down the sword and build socities and civilization and be Lawful Good.  Chaotic Good and Neutral Good are needed to ensure in perpetuity that Lawful Good does not allow soul killers to our society like Fox News.

The Old World is falling apart; we see it before our eyes.  We must be our own Foundation; every one of us.  I seek practical methologies to navigate these times not bankrupt dogmas like Anarchism that do shit like this.  My point as I walk you through this is to show you how you can organize the values that you hold dear and create a framework to know when you should apply one vs the other by doing the hard work for mometns of crisis ahead of time so you're not caught in ideological traps that cause more harm than good in the trenches.   Every man must be a tactician and a strategist; a lone agent a team player ready to switch to the most effective means against fascism, falsehood and tyranny.  Christocism shows that their is no master idiology no silver magic bullet but that we can act as if their is a greater truth worth striving for and defending all the same.

How do you fight corruption without becoming corrupt? What is the right level of introspection vs action? Dantes did both of these things and though a fictional character we can learn from this mirror into our darker shadows.   This isnt about moral purity, it's about Direct Action.   What we do now matters not only for us but for those who are to come.  And I intend to do my part to see if we can find a better, more fucking effective, way.

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

Ex Post Facto

The Republican White House and the Republican Congress have now voluntarily ceded their rights to Habeus Corpus and Ex Post Facto laws.   Anyone who belongs to the Republican party now voluntarily cedes their rights.   Donald Trump and the Republicans have now voluntarily excised these from their copies of the constitution which means that they are now allowing Democrats to past Ex Post Facto Laws and Bills of Attaineder targeting Republicans to have their citizenship stripped and have laws passed about their crimes retroactivelt applied to them without trial.

Democrats who object to this can join them.

Conservatism is far more likely than any other political movement to go fascist.  Frankly, I think it behooves any democracy to just outlaw it.  "Dicatorship!" They howl.  To vote for W.  To vote for H.W.  To vote for Reagan meant flirting with strong executitve.  If they are still a member of the Republican party they are endorsing all of the things that Trump does.   They've had many months to change their party affiliation.

We all know that they want a civil war, and they think they can win.  Maybe they can, but if they don't do you think we're going to sit around and let what happened in 1880 happen again?  Do you think there is going to be some partial reconstruction? You should only WISH that Tribunals happen as compared to the Committee for Public Safety.  I really think the Abundance Democrats think they can just Social Media Moderate their way to perpetual victory but the fact is, the Nihilionares have chosen a side and that side isnt the democrats.  Even if they still donate its to keep them as docile little Vichy puppies rather than be effective.

Mark my words....the Republicans will lose.  and the Centrist democrats think they are the ones who will rebuild the same broken America they sold us out to.

As if.

Sunday, July 6, 2025

Baileyism - We Bid Bedford Falls Goodbye

I want to write a book about this. In a better world, this was my ticket to honorary PhDs and a chance to become a great philosopher of the ages. The philosophers of old certainly didn't have fancy degrees any more than George Bailey did, but is there any doubt in your mind that the man was a scholar? A would-be founding father who found his time and place in a little realm called Bedford Falls. In a better world than ours—one that didn't throw away Obama's grassroots network, or let hanging chads decide an election, or fail to contest every precinct in Florida rather than let that man get away with his transparent cheating—in that world, this philosophy might have inspired people to give a damn in ways that don't require guns pointed by the government. I think, just like in It's a Wonderful Life, we need government, but we need to do more than that right now. 


But the problem is that the George Baileys of the world are fighting the real battle of Bedford Falls right now; they're protecting their neighbors from ICE raids and protesting pro-Nazi businesses. They're sheltering their neighbors, or if religious, doing actually Christian things like working at food kitchens and soup lines for the poor. The fact of the matter is, what we need right now is more... Monte Cristoism. So we say farewell to what could have been, and begin to move into what we need now. 


I have put the seed of the idea of this wonderful movie becoming a real thing for the world out there for you. And like Momma Dollar and Poppa Dollar I genuinely believe that not only can it be so but that the people who made the movie hoped their art to inspire it to be. There is nothing whistful about the movie in the slightest. But for now, in our time, the Bailey Buliding and Loan has served its purpose and now I think I just heard a knock on my cell door in le Chateu de If.

Thursday, April 24, 2025

This Will Be Shadowbanned - Saying it anyway

 Here is a video that is throttled by TikTok and seems to be google and it shows how dangerous these things are and how people are a secondary priority to $$$$$$.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Bluesky

Bluesky shut down an account the instant I recommended teslaing the WWE. Deplatforming is the primary tool of friends of the theocracy and fascism: but let me ask this?

why would you hire a Republican? Why not fire one? Why give one service? Ignore questions of right or wrong these fuckers are actively seeking to trash the dollar for rich technofascists sociopaths. Even if you were a dipstick and liked 45, 47 is a fucking loser moron that only nazis love.

If the rest of America TRULY SHUT OUT the republicans they would fold overnight. If you still have a maga you havent blocked, fired, spit on and cut out of your life then you are a human being.

but when their fuckery costs you your family, your house, your savings, your car or your job then remember what I said, these people are monsters and total losers and you are part of the problem

we have to learn some lessons the hard way

Friday, April 18, 2025

You Should Watch

https://substack.com/@deb8891/note/c-109766021?r=2mr252&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

AI Slop But You Deserve To Know

You've identified an interesting application of this principle to current socio-political movements.

When a movement contains multiple layers of disconnection from reality, its sustainability becomes even more precarious. The combination you're referring to - MAGA populism merged with a techno-libertarian or "technofascist" vision - does indeed contain potential contradictions and reality disconnects that could undermine its long-term viability:

1. Inherent contradictions between nostalgic traditionalism and accelerationist techno-utopianism

2. Economic promises that often conflict with economic realities and technological trends

3. Selective rejection of expertise and evidence-based thinking when it contradicts preferred narratives

4. Tendency to create information bubbles that limit exposure to contradictory evidence

The historical pattern suggests that movements with multiple reality disconnects tend to either:

- Fragment internally as the contradictions become impossible to reconcile

- Increasingly purge pragmatists, accelerating their decline

- Reform by abandoning the most reality-detached elements

- Collapse under external pressures they failed to anticipate

That said, the timeline for such movements to "fall hard" can vary widely based on external factors, leadership quality, and the absence of viable alternatives. Even deeply flawed movements can persist if they satisfy psychological needs for certainty or identity that their adherents value more than accuracy.

What's often most determinative is whether such movements gain sufficient institutional power to insulate themselves from consequences before reality reasserts itself.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​