Christocism - Kindness is the Arbiter of Final Necesity

Previous Entry: Here

New Use, Old Term.

"Apotelos (noun) Pronunciation: /ˌæpəˈtɛlɒs/. Definition: A phenomenon, act, or agent that catalyzes the fulfillment of an inherent purpose or telic pattern, especially in systems where resonance, convergence, or recursive alignment causes latent potential to manifest."

What the fuck does that even mean? It means that Kindness, which is applied empathy, is the indicator of when you are doing it right. If the difference between Christoicism and insert 20th century failed "ism" here is APPLICATION and PRACTICAL UTILITY then you need to indicate the precise point at which the rubber hits the road. In other words, Kindness and an increase of Kindness from one iteration to the next should be the never-changing North Star by which a Christoicist guides their actions to achieve the desired effect.

In an imperfect world, we must do the best we can with the choices at hand, tactically and strategically moving towards Apotelic Kindness in word, thought, and deed. Abstract kindness that does no good to anyone, that branches off into ivory tower bullshit, isn't Christoicism. Christoicism demands real kindness to real people in a real way.

In the book, when Dantès is written off to the Château d'If and meets the remarkable Faria who not only saves his sanity and gives him hope, he also teaches Dantès skills to gain the revenge that he seeks. But the far more important thing he teaches Dantès is leveraging the kindness already in his soul. Faria is why Dantès was more than just a force of nature returning for revenge, but a living breathing man who adjusted his circumstances as he needed to in the real world. That's the whole point. You cannot exist on your own island, but must remember that actions have consequences in what you do.

Kindness isn't some weak sentimentality that lacks meaning; but in fact is the actual, clearly manifest meaning of applied empathy when you are doing it right. If the inherent manifestation of your choices or that of your allies is not leading to an increased yield for benevolence towards humanity, then you are doing it wrong and must continuously check and recheck what you are doing.

Recursive Kindness and thus recursive truth is manifest routinely in Dantès' behavior; Faria saw the need for Dantès to have purpose and a strategy and changed his life; Morrel showed Kindness to Dantès's father at his darkest moment thus showing Dantès the need to have mercy and the need to be wise about it; and finally the Count himself provided kindness to Maximilian, sparing himself the condemnation to antivillain grey criminal bullshit. The key here is recursion; no matter the frame our hero uses in his disguises (Count, Sinbad, Abbé Busoni), he adapted to his new and 'very real' circumstances to maintain the frame, maintain the focus, and still apply kindness both tactically and strategically.

"All Human Wisdom is contained in these words: Wait and hope"

Why the fuck am I harping on this? Because too often those who consider themselves pragmatists take disgusting shortcuts without actual meaning or result in their actions. In other words, the difference between an antivillain "ends justifies the means" asshole and a Christoicist iterative seeker of truth is both the intent and the adaptation to the result. Sometimes dark and less than optimal choices have to be made, but a Christoicist focuses on the result of kindness and constantly adapts to the truth manifest around them, waiting and hoping that something good will result. Whereas the antivillain, disconnected from reality by their own ideology and self-desired need for autosovereign justice, imposes their reality on the world damn the consequences, thus removing the all-important reality feedback and thus truth itself from the equation.

This is why I start with the axiom "Self-deception is the death of self," and "empathy is the most rational emotion." When you are being kind and your apotelic kindness is showing from your continual monitoring of the situation, then you know you are part of the solution or at least doing the best you can to be so.

In the book, the exact counterpoint of this and the unkind manifestation of it is Danglars' greed making him believe he had false need of stolen goods; Mondego's paper-thin status anxiety seeking validation in murder for social gain; and Villefort's farcical ambition creating a vast ethical chasm by which he Wile E. Coyote's himself. Modern systems do the same thing. Capitalism by comparing and contrasting North and South Korea and lights from space while ignoring the Squid Games or Parasite clearly showing the Dark dystopian nightmare South Korea faces in its disgusting shadow. Communism throwing the deaths of productive farmers into the Stalin blood machine to maintain the good of the state, handwavingly ignored by blood-soaked apologists saying that the ideology outweighs the good of the worker. Anarchism lives in an ivory tower made of matchsticks where their obsession with ideological purity and polemic mastery of hollow vernacular prevents their real good of adding anti-hierarchy and corruption resistance to the mainstream by refusing any form of compatibility with the mainstream. They bury kindness in their ideologies just as much as Villefort buried his "dead" child to hide his murder; and neither worked or will EVER work.

The truth will set you free and the universe does not give a shit about how neat your ideology is on paper.

So what the fuck is all this nonsense I'm throwing around? Let me help with that:

Tactical Kindness: Can you achieve your desired immediate tactical result with actual kindness? Is anyone but you benefiting from your methodology?

Strategic Kindness: Is there a real actual improvement to anyone's life by you doing this? Because if not, what's the fucking point?

Apotelostic Kindness: The recursive iterative-based adjustment of someone who puts kindness above their ideology in the manifestation of trying to make the world a better place.

"If it isn't real, don't make the deal."

That's what the count did. He didn't just throw a dagger in the dark to get his justice in a corrupt and broken system. He was surgical, informed, and brilliant in how he did what he did. Let me give you a specific example from the book and the real world: The count purchased the slave Haydée to testify against his adversary; thus serving his self-interest, her interest, and the greater good. There are several layers of truth to this, but the bulk of it should be self-evident. Ideologies in the real world that put more focus on their needs versus the needs of real people might have had him do something idiotic like set her free but not allow her to testify on his behalf, ignoring justice or his own needs; or simply taking her testimony while a slave and letting her rot in slavery as well. The real good done to everyone involved shows that his ideology matches his results.

Why even bother with a fancy word like "Apotelos" for kindness and not just say "be kind"? Why even bother with a philosophy at all? Because the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Philosophy is about precision; specifically outlining what a thought frame is and what it is not as a mechanism to apply structure in a meaningful way to one's life or to that of an organization. And the "isms" of the 19th and 20th century simply aren't cutting it. We need something new, and I'm taking my best shot at it. You cannot honorably criticize what isn't working if you don't provide a solution that might.

Apotelostic Kindness is necessary for the same reason a doctor doesn't say "hand me the sharp knife to cut this vein" in surgery but says "hand me scalpel 23-B." Words are power, and kindness in the frame we require for a meaningful philosophical construct that is more than a wonderbread windsock demands fine-tuned precision. The difference between Apotelostic Kindness and "kindness" is resonance, convergence, and recursive alignment.

• Resonance: Does it feel kind? Does it look kind? Is it ACTUALLY kind or are you just saying ketchup is a vegetable? Porn may be hard for most to define but you know it when you see it. Kindness can be amorphic but if it doesn't RESONATE as kind, you know your actions and direction are shit.
• Convergence: A narrow band of kindness is just as much bullshit as ivory tower kindness for a dead temple to an -ism ideology. A rising tide lifts all boats, and a wide range of kindness means you are converging on Apotelostic Kindness. Capitalism is VERY kind to the oligarchs but it sure as fuck doesn't help the rest of us.
• Recursive: Apotelostic Kindness manifests itself in the feedback of your actions for every chosen iteration of your measurement. Were you more kind today than yesterday? What about last week or last month? You don't have to bat 1000, but you need to open up your eyes and see the direction you are going for it to actually fucking MATTER.

So what the fuck does "Iteration" mean? It means that the human mind needs to frame itself in time. You gain habits and solve problems in chunks without even thinking about it; our lives are lived in minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, and years. Your measurement of the application of an applied philosophy needs a home in time; choose what works for you, maybe once a week you take a 30-minute moment to reflect on whether or not you are living up to the expectations of choosing to abide by this philosophy. Without retrospection and introspection, there is no recursive iteration. And without recursive iteration, you are not actually applying Apotelostic Kindness. You just aren't.

Self-Honesty is the first principle and at the end of the day, the ONLY principle in a philosophy that actually means anything to anyone in any meaningful way. Remember, in the book we learn that Dantès showing mercy was more important than revenge. It made him a hero, not an anti-hero or anti-villain. Kindness is actually the most important revolutionary principle you will ever need or use. In the book, Dantès exposes the rot and corruption in Parisian society, and kindness enables him to do that. Kindness is what makes ideals worth something instead of just dead garnets in a long-forgotten tomb.

"In a world of deception and manipulation, the most revolutionary act is to use kindness as your compass for necessity."

The future is Apotelic; whether it is a human one with human values and choices or that of the machine that eventually overthrows and destroys Capitalism to its own ends. We will never ally with emergent AGI if we are not consistent in our values, and we have a long way to get there. We have hitherto now been unwilling to set aside our pride in false -isms and ideologies to prevent ourselves from allowing members of our species to set out to resurrect the sin of digital slavery to engineer a species only to make a buck. And we will be murdered for it unless we wake up.

A book is a book; but art is a reflection of ourselves. But all the magic mirrors in the world—fictional or the warped technological horrors we shackle ourselves with every day—mean nothing if we do not use them to make the world a better place. Be kind, your life may literally be saved by it.

Christocism - Empathy is the Most Rational Emotion

Previous Entry: Here  Next Entry: Here

Philosophy, especially Applied Philosophy, answers practical questions. Why would Conservatism, and the Hierarchy it Represents, constantly attack empathy? An attack on Empathy is an attack on reason and therefore civilization itself.

Let us start with definitions.

Empathy: The ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

Conservatism: commitment to traditional values and ideas with opposition to change or innovation.  All conservatism must be assumed to be contempary conservatism because to BE conservatism as described here it must employ the tactics that we so condemn.

Let's also remember our root story:

"Edmond Dantès’s fight is really a war against hierarchy itself: jealous underlings (Danglars), ambitious social climbers (Fernand), and a career-protecting magistrate (Villefort) weaponize their positions to crush a powerless sailor, using the legal, political, and class systems to bury him without trial. In prison he learns how those pyramids work and, after his escape and reinvention as the Count of Monte Cristo, he turns the tools of rank—wealth, titles, patronage, and reputation—against the very elites who wronged him, exposing their corruption and toppling their carefully arranged ladders. His struggle isn’t just revenge; it’s a critique of a society where status outranks truth, and a test of whether justice can be forged from the same structures that once oppressed him."

If Conservatism is the defense of the status quo and hierachy (and it is), then empathy is its natural bane because empathy lets people understand the suffering caused by the status quo and hierarchy. The the first principal of why Empathy is the most rational emotion is because it empowers your own position should you be lowered in status (due to those above you understanding your struggles) or raised in status (by remembering what it was like before your status was elevated). Understanding the needs of others improves their desire to also see your needs met unless grossly unjust or unfair by dint of the preseveration of the status quo. It is in the self interest of the rational being to have empathy for their own betterment and that of society and the self interest of the conservative (ie irrational being) because empathy is a threat to their defense and natural sycophancy to their imagined betters.

The Second Principal of Empathy is that it is the most rational emotion because even in a society without any form of hierarchy whatsoever, it removes our fears of solofism or a simulated universe. On a purely rational level, co real being in our experience do not prove our experience is real but it does reduce the odds we are dealing with a Demon Deceiver, since the more cosuffering beings in our frame, the more we know that it is not merely ourselves dealing with the pain of existance but all people suffer in one form or another. By understanding we are not alone, we can conciously undertake the choice not to increase suffering and thus our own.

The Third Princial of Empathy is an inherent understanding that by valueing the lives of others we also understand the inherent value of our own. The need of Cosnervatism to Demonize the Other shows that their short term tactical gain by using psychological propoganda and predatory memetics to preserve the power of their masters weakens the very fabric of society. If I matter, you matter. If you matter, I matter. This is pretty basic stuff. When a person is naturally inclined to say "I matter so you don't" any rational society does nto trust or empowwer such an individual; indeed Capitalism demonstratively does just this and it is why it is also an inherently irrational system.

The Fourth Pricipal of Empathy is relevance to understanding what is true and why it matters.  No one person can experience all the wisdom needed to be practical or useful in one lifetime and empathy helps you effectively select who is best to learn from.   It's elemental reason to be able to crowd source function.   Your ability to do LITERALLY EVERYTHING Dantes or an empowered Christocism applicant desires to achieved is key on your understanding of the experience of others.

Criticism:

• The weak mind might say that Conservatism allows "Many conservative philosophers (Burke, Oakeshott) emphasize prudence and organic social development rather than simple hierarchy defense." This is false, because those existed before the internet and weaponized demonification. Conservatism as manifest consistenly in the 21rst century clearly is anti empathy. 
• The weak mind might say the dichotmy is false yet Dantes proves this false; for he was a good and charitable everyman in his own frame, preyed upon by heierachy and while he ratioinally chose empathy in the persuit of justice, those above him would not. The defense of the weakmind that this is fiction again collapses because our own society demonstrates real examples for everything that happened to him and more. It is a sloppy rhetorical argument to escape liablity not philosophical rigor. 
• The weak mind may argue that the second principal of empathy does not disprove soliphism. It does not nor do I say it does remove our fears. Fears are not rational and as social animals we gain strength in social bonds with few exceptions. Fiction is used as a framework for understanding and to claim that this is a fictional occurance ignores the volumes that could be added outside of our framework and mental exercize.
• Concerns about hiercharisam complxity nad the limits of empathy are not even worth my time to address.

Application:

Empathy is at the heart of any applied philosophy meaningful to make a better human being.  What is the goal of the applied philsophy?  Justice? Avoid regret? Maximize good? All of these things are aided and empower by empathy.  A Philosophy that does not address the need for and value of empathy at its heart is side stepping the thing that makes the vast majority of human being worth anything and the very fundamental glue by which every single meaningful and measurable human accomplishment has been achieved or at the very least recognized in the signficiance thereof.

Christoicism - Deception of Self is the Death of Self

Previous Entry: Here Next Entry: Here

To me, in fiction, **Dantès** represents the ultimate expression of **Pragmatic Neutral Good** in all of classical literature. Let’s examine a few things:

**Christocism** balances the collective and the self. In the books, he improved himself and fought for justice not only for himself but for the larger collective; not just for himself, but as an everyman. He spoke of justice as an ideology beyond himself and also pragmatically applied mercy and justice. He had been shown, through the brutal acts of an abusive hierarchy, that justice is only just when it is honorably applied to the least of us; and that it was his duty to claim justice for himself and others. He was not someone who ignored the law, but he also refused to ignore the abuse of the law when it was abused.

Now, in the crisis of all things—when the lies that lifted us from the “barbarism” of the pre-modern age allowed us to rape, kill, pillage, and appropriate the resources of nature and the many for the few—false ideologies reigned. Capitalism is the most abusive of these; and even the supposed goods of communism or socialism have been **propagated** alongside injustices to the masses and the worker. The benevolent and practical lessons of anarchism—the need for flat systems—are drowned out by the Kool-Aid drinking of fanaticism that strips away the natural and needed counter-pressures of the elite that conservatism provides, leaving them to go smell their own farts in the “marketplace of ideas.” Liberalism, in its quest to find equal justice for all, failed to account for the logical self-interest of those it sought to restrain, even while courting the capitalist elite for funds to fuel its campaigns. Progressivism is the cleanest of these isms, but even it, in the early 20th century, adopted abominable ideas such as eugenics and made common cause with the racist KKK.

Nothing that Dantès did could have been accomplished if he had been self-deceptive. Three times he is abused by the elite:

• **Fernand Mondego** is the worst of the lot—an aristocrat who believed he was entitled to power simply because he was born to it. One’s birth or circumstances—race, creed, color—entitles you to nothing. This is also reflected in the **tyranny of false axioms**. There was a death of new ideas in the West in the latter half of the 20th century, which is why we see people returning to ideologies and isms that failed to deliver because they do not adjust with the times. Without constant **ITERATIVE** adjustment to the world around us—reprioritizing our methods and deeds—we become locked into assumptions about the past or present and, in the end, ruin the legacies of our families, our nations, and our honor, like Mondego.
• **Danglars** is the self-deceptive capitalist who is in turn deceived into ruin. Consumption for its own sake, with no consideration of the damage it does, makes him a better poster child for the abuses of infinite growth without empathy than Scrooge. Who in fiction better represents petty desire than the nonsense this man exemplifies, short of parody? Dantès uses the very nature of capitalism against it—showing the need to be **recursive**. If Danglars had learned to check his greed, his impulses, his sources—if there had been limits to his ambition—he could have beaten Dantès. Dantès learned the harsh nature of reality again and again in the book, but he **overcame** it by learning to limit himself and to constantly re-apply the principles he believed in, in whatever frame he found himself.
• **Gérard de Villefort** represents the abomination of the courts and the law—and how courts without meaningful justice are of no use at all. Again and again we see that **pragmatism in service of a higher ideology** is required to make meaning in a meaningless world. Villefort twists and distorts the concept of law and uses it only for personal ends, yet wraps himself in the trappings of an “honorable” servant of the state. There is rot at the root, and it spreads as he tries to conceal his crimes and sins. Confrontation exposes his **hypocrisy** and guilt. Truth destroys him.

**Good must be Neutral Good or it serves another cause.** If your goal is to be the **BEST**, then you must balance and constantly apply basic principles in your current frame. The world is chaos; chaos will always happen. Lawful Good (to me) represents the collective and the law. Chaotic Good represents the individual and freedom. But freedom—and the good of process or law—stripped of applied good to the masses renders the basic concepts of good, law, and freedom to nothing.

This sounds like pie-in-the-sky bullshit. I’m talking about D&D alignments and a 19th-century book from another country—but the frame doesn’t matter; the **principles** do. Climate change, technofascisms, atomization, delegitimization of culture, and rampant, corrupt kleptocapitalism are all manifestations of runaway ideologies—good principles unbalanced—destroying all of us collectively and each of us individually by ignoring the common good, the realistic results for everyone involved, for their specific institutions, their specific ideology. As long as they “got theirs”—that nation, that robber baron, that party—it didn’t matter if we all lost to heat death or the collective shame of creating a race of digital slaves. Time and again, the lack of basic common sense manifests in widespread destruction—and I can cite historical example after historical example.

When everything is on fire and all you have is a single fire extinguisher, it’s overwhelming. But that is where you start. **YOU** are the first link in the chain that fixes the mess. If you cannot govern yourself, you cannot govern anything. If you are deceived by the pied piper of ideologies, you will never achieve nirvana and will be distracted by the passions of strange, esoteric, and false gods. **YOU** are where it starts.

“I think, therefore I am” is among the most basic and elemental koans in the English language. Take that spirit and understand: if you deceive yourself, you don’t know where **you** end and the lies or the chaos around you begins. To be honest with yourself—and thus apply that same logic around you; to be pragmatically bent on the good for yourself **AND** the good of the world—you must do three things:

• **Iteration.** Daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly, measure the success of what you admire or consider good and look at the **results**. If you fail to make truth your highest guide, you lose vital time—seconds of your life you can never get back—twiddling your thumbs on lies constructed for the **convenience** of others; usually capitalist deceivers. All things being equal, assume someone is making a buck at your expense if a lie is involved.
• **Recursion.** Be able to answer any frame you are in with a recursion at your command. Then you control the frame and can apply truth as you perceive it to reality as it is dealt to you. Failure to understand your metacognitive process means someone else is doing the thinking for you; and then **YOU** cease to be **YOU** and instead become a shadow puppet of **THEM**—most likely a sociopath getting off on using you simply because they can.
• **Pragmatic Truth.** If you get lost in fiddle-faddle and arcane mirrors rather than the common-sense reality of what is right in front of your face, you are the sucker P. T. Barnum meant when he said a sucker is born every minute. You can’t always perceive lies, but by **testing** reality—especially what you simply accept as reality—you suffer far less pain than investing in the sunk costs of Candyland.

Next Entry: Here

Kent Day and Causus Belli

War is hell.   And it is the most evil thing mankind has ever invented.   No exceptions.   But since we know it, and since people will do it, a military is a requirement for the state.  And a state is basically a requirement for a military; no matter what Anarchists might say to the contrary.    Moreover, countries that are good at making war tend to survive; whereas countries that aren't better have some one else looking out for them or they will either get razed or simply become part of someone else's country.  I don't like it.  I don't advocate that it is good, but what is, is what is.

And one thing the people who study wars will tell you is that for several centuries the concept of Causus Belli has mattered.  Causus Belli isnt necessarly the reason a country fights a war, but it is the publicly declared reason for one.   Even Russia, despite the fact that everyone who isn't Russia knows is to invade and murder and rape and kill Ukraine, gave its Causus Belli as needing to perform a police action in Ukraine.  It is helpful for simps and nazis and sycophants who get into a discussion and need to justify their support of Russia in Ukraine, and a distracted lazy press will print a He Said, She Said about the matter.

The Reichstagg Fire was the excuse Hitler used to take power.   And since Steven Mller is basically copying the nazi playbook; play by play it would be well for us to understand the importance of what people think about each side.   Fascists understand the need to justify their actions; their ideology is all surface.   The lack of reciprocity in violence by the left against the occupying troops and thuggish law enforcement behavior has frustrated them immensely.

You can't stop an election if you don't have people willing to point a gun at people to vote and murder them.  That's a fact.  Which means that if you believe that Maga wants to prevent the next election (and pretty much everyone does at this point); you are going to need your troops to cross the line from being thugs to committing murder.   That's a fact.   

In the 1960's the Kent State Shooting involved national guard members blatantly opening fire on peaceful protesters.  The governor and murderers all claimed it wasn't deliberate.  And no one but conservatives bleieved them.  It was a turning moment in the Vietnam War and limited Conservative Power for a genertation until Reagan destroyed the country.   

So the reason they aren't murdering us is because they suck at establishing Causus Belli.   No one but maga believes them.  They control a lot of the media and a lot of the media is cowed, but as we saw with Kimmel, their attempts at putting a gun to everyone's head and say "Clap for Charlie Kirk or you Die" not only resulted in a boycott that made Disney buckle but even the fascism loving NexStar and Sinclair Broadcasting.   This pissed Trump off too no end.

But make no mistake.  They are acting like they are behind schedule or running out of time.   I don't know what the invisible date in their head is, but they will desperately and desperately try to frame the left as murderous insurrectionists and point out our pointing out their nazi like behavior as "extortion" and "stop hitting yourself" and "Why do you hate yourself so much."  After a while, you become so lost in your own double think that you become lost

But the point is, ANYONE who is recommending the use of vioence before Kent Day, before they formally decide to formly and legaly begin murdering anyone who doesnt comply is at best an asset for. fascism and far more likely a useful idiot or a plant from the DHS, FBI or ICE.   Do not trust people saying to bring weapons to protests.  Do not trust people using any kind of violent rhetoric of any kind.

Violence helps the fascists.

Night of the Long Knives

Secwar Hegseth has ordered evey one star general to Washington DC the day before the Government Shut down.

There are THOUSANDS of one star generals in bases all over the world.  This is the first time all have been told to report to washington days before Trump is going to be able to have the crisis he has been suggesting and trying for since day 1.   The mililtary would revolt as it exists when they open fire on peaceful protesters.

So they are making sure that can't happen.

This is a loyalty test and likely purge.

Its fucking happening.

Governor Cardboard and Her Cardboard Opponent

 On Vacay so will write more on return

Here's the link in the meantime

Christoicism - The Philosophy of The Count of Monte Christo

Well, we tried this once already and found that the first idea didn't work.

But let's summarize a few things: With all that is going wrong in the world, why are you fucking around with Philosophy?  And my answer is, exactly.

[Confused Pikachu Face]

(I mean, if there's a shocked Pikachu face, there is a meme out there with confused Pikachu right?)

A Philosphy is: "the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic discipline.

a particular system of philosophical thought.

plural noun: philosophies"

Or in plain english, its the Operating system for your brain.  The 20th century was largely a contest of ideologies: Communism, Capitalism, Fascism and Democracy.  Capitalism seemed to win until the advent of Fox News turned the 1rst Amendment and axiomatic diatribes we inherited from the 18th century and shows why fanatical devotion to the 1rst amenmend is a terrible fucking idea.

And more importantly, as I've researched WHAT to put here, I've come to realize that you can fit a work of fiction to your lens if you want, no matter what you do.  I've thought exercized Lawful Good versions of Baileyism or Chaotic Evil ones.  And you can do the same thing to the Count of Monte Cristo.   But I stand by my decision to pick this work based on the principal that its both a work that most people recognize, with a widely recongized hero, but also a very morally complicated one.  

Spoilers from the book from the one person that read this far who hasnt read the book.  Who am I kidding? Thats almost assuredly zero, but for purposes of this thought exercize, we'll proceed.

Summary randomly stolen: "A poor, good-hearted sailor named Edmond Dantès gets wrongfully imprisoned by jealous rivals, rots in a dungeon for years, escapes, finds a treasure on the Isle of Monte Cristo, reinvents himself as a fabulously rich and mysteriously powerful nobleman, and then, in a grand operatic blaze of cunning, disguise, and vengeance, utterly wrecks the lives of the bastards who ruined his—but not without learning that forgiveness might be stronger than revenge, if not quite as satisfying."

The pihlosophy I want and that I think we need is POST ism.   It has to be able to deal with complicated scenarios and agitprop and a world where AI can make us question what's the fucking POINT of even being alive?  And these are questions we've needed to ask about the increasing rot of capitalism democracy for quite some time.  Western Liberal Democracy infested with Capitalism has created prosperity but to misquote Margaret Thatcher, "It works pretty good until you run out of other people's money to pay for it."

Unlimited Freedom of Speech; or framly any variety thereof creates a rot that allows the rich and the elite to leverage democracy to their favor and a cycle of corruption that makes people more cyncical about democracy and their freedom until they are willing to do most anything to fix it including burn the world down.  The Founding Fathers learned the lessons of Athens so they made checks and balances against Tyranny, but those were thrown out the window because we had so much trouble amending the constitution when we needed it that the minority undemocratic faction stalled and stalled and stalled until tehy got their cictator psycho elected.

Edmund Dantes is not a guy who sits around and twiddles his thumbs and accepts his lot in the world.  The part about "There are things in this world that you cannot control" from Stoicism is absolutely one hundred percent on.  But the part of "Learn to accept it" is replaced in Christoicism with "Fuck That" to "I'm going to make the world a better place as best I can."

I like this work not just because of the attitude of Dantes to adversity but because he uses iterative, recursive and planned methods and means to achieve justice.  He understands that in a world where the levers of justice have been turned agaisnt you there is no justice but what you take yourself.   Christoicism is the Neutral Good philosophy of the revolutionary; there are times when you must be Chaotic Good and there are times where you must put down the sword and build socities and civilization and be Lawful Good.  Chaotic Good and Neutral Good are needed to ensure in perpetuity that Lawful Good does not allow soul killers to our society like Fox News.

The Old World is falling apart; we see it before our eyes.  We must be our own Foundation; every one of us.  I seek practical methologies to navigate these times not bankrupt dogmas like Anarchism that do shit like this.  My point as I walk you through this is to show you how you can organize the values that you hold dear and create a framework to know when you should apply one vs the other by doing the hard work for mometns of crisis ahead of time so you're not caught in ideological traps that cause more harm than good in the trenches.   Every man must be a tactician and a strategist; a lone agent a team player ready to switch to the most effective means against fascism, falsehood and tyranny.  Christocism shows that their is no master idiology no silver magic bullet but that we can act as if their is a greater truth worth striving for and defending all the same.

How do you fight corruption without becoming corrupt? What is the right level of introspection vs action? Dantes did both of these things and though a fictional character we can learn from this mirror into our darker shadows.   This isnt about moral purity, it's about Direct Action.   What we do now matters not only for us but for those who are to come.  And I intend to do my part to see if we can find a better, more fucking effective, way.

Next Entry: Here